Contact: Steve Mashuda, Earthjustice, (206) 343-7340, x1027
Miyoko Sakashita, Center for Biological Diversity, 415-632-5308
Hawk Rosales, InterTribal Sinkyone Wilderness Council, (707) 489-3640
Marcie Keever, Friends of the Earth, (415) 544-0790 x223
Kyle Loring, Friends of the San Juans, (360) 378-2319
Jessica Lass, NRDC, (310) 434-2300
Heather Trim, People For Puget Sound, (206) 351-2898
Navy Training Blasts Marine Mammals with Harmful Sonar
Wildlife protection agency challenged for not doing its job
Earthjustice, representing InterTribal Sinkyone Wilderness Council, Center for Biological Diversity, Friends of the Earth, Friends of the San Juans, Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), and People For Puget Sound, today filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the District of Northern California challenging NMFS’s approval of the Navy’s training activities in its Northwest Training Range Complex. The lawsuit calls on NMFS to mitigate anticipated harm to marine mammals and biologically critical areas within the training range that stretches from Northern California to the Canadian border.
“These training exercises will harm dozens of protected species of marine mammals -- Southern Resident killer whales, blue whales, humpback whales, dolphins, and porpoises -- through the use of high-intensity mid-frequency sonar,” said Steve Mashuda, an Earthjustice attorney representing the groups. “The Fisheries Service fell down on the job and failed to require the Navy to take reasonable and effective actions to protect them.”
The Navy uses a vast area of the West Coast for training activities including anti-submarine warfare exercises involving tracking aircraft and sonar; surface-to-air gunnery and missile exercises; air-to-surface bombing exercises; sink exercises; and extensive testing for several new weapons systems.
“Since the beginning of time, the Sinkyone Council’s member Tribes have gathered, harvested and fished for traditional cultural marine resources in this area, and they continue to carry out these subsistence ways of life, and their ceremonial activities along this Tribal ancestral coastline. Our traditional cultural lifeways, and our relatives such as the whales and many other species, will be negatively and permanently impacted by the Navy’s activities,” said Priscilla Hunter, chairwoman and co-founder of the InterTribal Sinkyone Wilderness Council. “Both NMFS and the Navy have failed in their obligations to conduct government-to-government consultation with the Sinkyone Council and its member Tribes regarding project impacts.”
In late 2010, NMFS gave the Navy a permit for five years of expanded naval activity that will harm or “take” marine mammals and other sealife. The permit allows the Navy to conduct increased training exercises that can harm marine mammals and disrupt their migration, nursing, breeding, or feeding, primarily as a result of harassment through exposure to the use of sonar.
“The Navy’s Northwest Training Range is the size of the State of California, yet not one square inch is off-limits to the most harmful aspects of naval testing and training activities,” said Zak Smith, staff attorney for NRDC. “We are asking for common-sense measures to protect the critical wildlife that lives within the training range from exposure to life-threatening effects of sonar. Biologically rich areas like the Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary should be protected.”
The Navy’s mid-frequency sonar has been implicated in mass strandings of marine mammals in, among other places, the Bahamas, Greece, the Canary Islands, and Spain. In 2004, during war games near Hawai’i, the Navy’s sonar was implicated in a mass beaching of up to 200 melon-headed whales in Hanalei Bay. In 2003, the USS Shoup, operating in Washington’s Haro Strait, exposed a group of endangered Southern Resident killer whales to mid-frequency sonar, causing the animals to stop feeding and attempt to flee the sound.
“In 2003, NMFS learned firsthand the harmful impacts of Navy sonar in Washington waters when active sonar blasts distressed members of J pod, one of our resident pods of endangered orcas,” said Kyle Loring, Staff Attorney for Friends of the San Juans. “Given this history, it is particularly distressing that NMFS approved the Navy’s use of deafening noises in areas where whales and dolphins use their acute hearing to feed, navigate, and raise their young, even in designated sanctuaries and marine reserves.”
“Whales and other marine mammals don’t stand a chance against the Navy,” said Miyoko Sakashita, Oceans Director at the Center for Biological Diversity.
The Navy’s mitigation plan for sonar use relies primarily on visual detection of whales or other marine mammals by so-called “ watch-standers” with binoculars on the decks of ships. If mammals are seen in the vicinity of an exercise, the Navy is to cease sonar use.
“Visual detection can miss anywhere from 25-95% of the marine mammals in an area,” said Heather Trim, Director of Policy for People For Puget Sound. “It’s particularly unreliable in rough seas or in bad weather. We learn more every day about where whales and other mammals are most likely to be found – we want NMFS to put that knowledge to use to ensure that the Navy’s training avoids those areas when marine mammals are most likely there.”
The litigation is not intended to halt the Navy’s exercises, but asks the Court to require NMFS to reassess the permits using the latest science and to order the Navy to stay out of biologically critical areas at least at certain times of the year.
Marcie Keever of Friends of the Earth noted, “It has become increasingly clear from recent research that the endangered Southern Resident killer whale community uses coastal waters within the Navy’s training range to find salmon during the fall and winter months. NMFS has failed in its duty to assure that the Navy is not pushing the whales closer to extinction.”
Earthjustice is a non-profit public interest law firm dedicated to protecting the magnificent places, natural resources, and wildlife of this earth, and to defending the right of all people to a healthy environment.
The InterTribal Sinkyone Wilderness Council is comprised of ten federally recognized Northern California Indian Tribes with ancient and enduring subsistence and cultural ties to the Sinkyone Coast, an area that will be affected by the Navy’s expanded training activities.
NRDC is an international nonprofit environmental organization with more than 1.3 million members and online activists. Since 1970, NRDC has worked to protect the world's natural resources, public health, and the environment.
People For Puget Sound is a regional nonprofit with a 20-year history of using science and engaging citizens to safeguard and improve the health of Puget Sound and the Northwest Straits.
Founded in 1979, Friends of the San Juans pursues its mission to protect the land, water, sea, and livability of the San Juan Islands through science, education, stewardship, and advocacy.
Friends of the Earth fights to defend the environment and create a more healthy and just world. Our campaigns focus on promoting clean energy and solutions to climate change, keeping toxic and risky technologies out of the food we eat and products we use, and protecting marine ecosystems and the people who live and work near them.
The Center for Biological Diversity works through science, law and creative media to secure a future for all species, great or small, hovering on the brink of extinction.
]]>Rein Attemann, People For Puget Sound, (206) 334-6472, rattemann@pugetsound.org
Kerry McHugh, Washington Environmental Council, (206) 902-7555, kerry@wecprotects.org
Olympia, WA – Citizens will gather in Olympia on Wednesday, January 25th, as part of the 20th annual Environmental Lobby Day. Hosted by the Environmental Priorities Coalition, this day of action offers citizens the chance to meet with their legislators in support of environmental issues.
WHAT: 20th Annual Environmental Lobby Day
WHERE: United Churches of Olympia, 110 11th Ave SE, Olympia
WHEN: Wed, January 25, 2012; 9:00 am 5:00 pm
FEATURED SPEAKERS: Tom Bancroft, People For Puget Sound; Christi Norman, Audubon Washington; Phil Anderson, Director, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife; Brendon Cechovic, Washington Conservation Voters; Senator Sharon Nelson and Commissioner of Public Lands Peter Goldmark, starting at 9:15 am
The 2012 Priorities are:
“Each year for the last 20 years, citizens have stood up for Washington’s land, air, and water – together we’ve achieved some landmark successes and worked to prevent rollbacks of our environmental protections,” said Rein Attemann, Advocacy Manager for People For Puget Sound, a Coalition member organization.
Last year Rep. Dave Upthegrove (33rd District) told lobby day attendees, “A citizen from our district who communicates an issue to us is more powerful than any paid lobbyist, because at the end of the day we represent you.”
More information about the event here.
More information about the Environmental Priorities here.
]]>
For more information contact Heather Trim, Director of Policy.
]]>
Restore America's Estuaries has opened the Call for Proposals for its 6th National Conference on Coastal and Estuarine Habitat Restoration, October 20-24, 2012, in Tampa, Florida. The Conference theme is "Restoring Ecosystems, Strengthening Communities."
RAE is seeking proposals for dedicated sessions, presentations, and posters for all coastal and estuarine habitat restoration-related topics, but particularly proposals dealing with the intersection of local and regional economies with healthy coastal ecosystems.
All proposals are due February 1, 2012.
To submit a proposal: program.estuaries.org
For more information visit the conference website: http://estuaries.org/conference/
Contact:
Jody Kennedy, Surfrider Foundation, cell (206) 940-6509
Katrina Rosen, Environment Washington, cell (206) 841-5141
Rein Atteman, People For Puget Sound, cell (206) 334-6472
Brady Montz, Sierra Club, cell (425) 891-5087
Sally Wolf, Zero Waste Seattle, cell (206) 579-0500
Bag ordinance passes: plastic bag ban, 5 cents on paper bags. goes into effect 7/1/12
Seattle. The Seattle City Council today unanimously passed the Seattle Bag Ordinance (Council Bill 11734). This vote was applauded by the coalition of environmental groups – Environment Washington, Surfrider Foundation, People For Puget Sound, Sierra Club, Zero Waste Seattle, and others – who have been working to develop grassroots support for the ordinance.
Special praise goes to Council Member Mike O’Brien for his leadership on the bag ordinance and the phone book opt-out ordinance last year.
“This ordinance to ban plastic bags is part of a larger Zero Waste initiative that also includes a ban on styrofoam, citywide residential organics composting, and providing our residents and businesses with a chance to stop unwanted yellow pages deliveries. These are all concrete steps towards reducing unnecessary waste in Seattle,” said O’Brien. “We are saving the city money and we are reducing impacts on the environment. Building towards our waste reduction goals are also a key part of our overall efforts to be a carbon neutral city by 2050.”
The Bag Ordinance passed by Seattle City Council bans thin single-use plastic bags at checkout stands. The ordinance includes a pass through fee of 5 cents for paper bags. .
The Seattle bag ordinance has the same requirements as the Bellingham ordinance passed in July. Edmonds and Mukilteo have banned plastic bags and did not include a 4 cent carry-through fee.
“We are pleased to see bag action in a number of Washington cities,” said Katrina Rosin, Environment Washington's Field Director. “There seems to be a growing momentum in Washington as well as along the west coast.”
The ordinance supports the City’s zero waste strategy and efforts to clean up Puget Sound and other essential waterways. “We are pleased that the city has shown leadership on foamed polystyrene, then phone books and bags,” said Sally Wolf of Zero Waste Seattle.
Brady Montz of the Sierra Club, Seattle Group continued, “Zero waste efforts like that on bags are adding up. We see these all contributing to the steps Seattle is taking to reduce our carbon footprint.”
“Tiny bit of plastics, including plastic bag film, are being found in all water samples taken in Puget Sound,” said Heather Trim, Policy Director of People For Puget Sound. “Reducing the use of single-use plastics, like bags, will make a difference for the health of wildlife in Puget Sound and out in the Pacific.”
Reduction of plastic bags is an international issue for the Surfrider Foundation which works to reduce plastic debris in the oceans. “Our members are out on the water,” said Jody Kennedy, Policy Manager with the Surfrider Foundation. “They see the plastic. This has motivated our members to help do beach cleanups almost every week throughout the year.”
Seattle’s ordinance was passed with support from Seattle’s recycling contractors--Allied Waste and Cedar Grove – as well as support from the Northwest Grocery Association. The American Chemistry Association and their affiliates were in opposition.
For more info:
Environment Washington: www.environmentwashington.org
People For Puget Sound: www.pugetsound.org
Surfrider Foundation: http://ww2.surfrider.org/seattle
Sierra Club, Seattle Group/Washington State Chapter: http://cascade.sierraclub.org
Zero Waste Seattle: www.zerowasteseattle.org
]]>
For more information contact Keeley O'Connell.
]]>Council President Richard Conlin
Councilmember Sally Bagshaw
Councilmember Tim Burgess
Councilmember Sally J. Clark
Councilmember Jean Godden
Councilmember Bruce Harrell
Councilmember Nick Licata
Councilmember Mike O’Brien
Councilmember Tom Rasmussen
Contact:
Josh Fogt, Councilmember O’Brien’s Office, 206-684-8800
Laura Lockard, Council Communications, 206-684-8159
Plastic bags proven to be major threat to health of Puget Sound and ocean marine life.
Seattle – Today Seattle City Council introduced Council Bill 117345, intended to help clean up Puget Sound and protect marine wildlife by banning single-use plastic bags. This legislation gives Seattle an opportunity to join Bellingham and Edmonds in Washington, as well as cities up and down the West Coast and more than 20 nations worldwide in efforts to curb the impact of single-use plastic bags on the environment.
Washingtonians use more than 2 billion single-use plastic bags each year. Seattle alone uses some 292 million plastic bags annually. A recent report by Environment Washington provides compelling evidence of the damage these bags cause to marine life.
“We all remember the beached grey whale found dead in West Seattle last year with 20 plastic bags in its stomach. The problem plastics pose for the Sound and ocean is pervasive and alarming,” said prime sponsor, Councilmember Mike O’Brien. “These bags provide minutes of use for us as consumers, but because they are not biodegradable are with us in the environment for hundreds of years.”
“We have learned so much more in the past few years about the harmful impacts of these plastic bags on our waters,” said Tom Bancroft, Executive Director of People for Puget Sound. “Studies show birds, sea turtles and other wildlife often mistake the plastic for food. Not only are tiny bits of plastic accumulating in the Sound and ocean, these plastics may be a pathway for toxic chemicals to get into wildlife. We owe it to future generations to curb our use of these bags now, before we do irreparable harm to Puget Sound and the Pacific Ocean.”
In addition to a ban on plastic bags, the ordinance will promote reusable bags instead of simply switching to disposable paper bags. The law would require that retailers charge a five-cent pass through cost on each paper bag to consumers who do not bring reusable bags. The nickel serves as a reminder to consumers to bring reusable bags. Retailers would keep the nickel as a means for recovering costs of switching to paper bags.
“I said last year that Seattle needed bold, decisive action and that we needed an outright ban on plastic bags. It’s time for Seattle to demonstrate our environmental leadership and join the growing movement against these bags,” said Councilmember Tim Burgess.
“Using the Bellingham model is a smart approach that addresses concerns raised by Seattle voters when they voted down the 2008 ordinance. It addresses concerns about taxes by allowing grocers and retailers to keep the fee on paper bags to cover costs, and addresses concerns about impacts on low-income people by exempting those on assistance programs,” said Councilmember Nick Licata.
“This initiative is a logical next step in Seattle’s commitment to Zero Waste, a successful effort I spearheaded to increase our recycling rate and cap our total tonnage of garbage at 2006 levels,” said Council President Richard Conlin. “Promoting reusable materials is crucial to our Zero Waste goal. I’m confident that this approach to decreasing the use of disposable bags will be workable for consumers and retailers alike.”
The bill introduced by Councilmember O’Brien is co-sponsored by Council President Conlin and Councilmembers Bagshaw, Burgess, Clark, Godden, and Licata. Seattle’s bag ban would go live six months from passage of the ordinance. The ordinance is nearly identical to the Bellingham law that was passed in July 2011 and will go into effect in July 2012. For grocers and other retailers, consistency in the legislation across the region is seen as crucial for adapting their business models.
Seattle Public Utilities would be responsible for outreach and education with Seattle businesses to aide in the transition to the new law. The utilities’ solid waste division would also manage monitoring and enforcement once the ban goes into effect.
Seattle City Council meetings are cablecast and Webcast live on Seattle Channel 21 and on the City Council’s website. Copies of legislation, Council meeting calendar, and archives of news releases can be found on the City Council website. Follow the Council on Twitter and on Facebook.
]]>Contact:
Sian Wu, 206-374-7795 x102, sian@resource-media.org
Kerry McHugh, 206-631-2605, kerry@wecprotects.org
Bruce Wishart, 360-223-2033, wishart.bruce@gmail.com
Chris Wilke, 206-851-9483, chris@pugetsoundkeeper.org
PUGET SOUND HEALTH HINGES ON NEW STORMWATER PLAN
Current draft fails to deliver on green building solutions, contains developer loopholes
OLYMPIA, Wash. —Today the Department of Ecology issued its draft revisions of the stormwater permits for large and medium-sized cities. The stormwater permits sets standards for using green infrastructure (or Low Impact Development) solutions for new development and redevelopment projects in order to prevent stormwater pollution coming from streets and paved development. Collectively, these permits are the primary statewide regulatory tool to protect public waterways, including streams, lakes, rivers and marine waters from polluted runoff.
“These new permits are our biggest chance to make real progress in the restoration of Puget Sound,” said Chris Wilke, Executive Director of Puget Soundkeeper Alliance. “Unfortunately, the current drafts fail to deliver on proven solutions to reduce toxic runoff.”
In 2008, a state hearings board issued a landmark decision in favor of Puget Soundkeeper Alliance requiring that cities and counties around Puget Sound take more aggressive steps to reduce polluted runoff. Urban and suburban areas are required to have a stormwater permit under the federal Clean Water Act, because their storm sewers discharge polluted runoff into creeks, lakes, rivers and marine waters such as Puget Sound. This runoff is now the single largest source of toxic pollution entering Puget Sound, and plays a major role in destroying salmon runs, closing shellfish beds and swimming beaches and contributing to sewage overflows.
Green infrastructure technologies are engineered solutions that slow down and filter polluted runoff by mimicking the filtration provided by natural systems. These techniques have been shown to stop pollution effectively, and at a lower cost than traditional stormwater infrastructure.
“The state has been talking for a long time about how big this pollution problem is. Now is our chance to see some actual results,” said Bruce Wishart, speaking for People for Puget Sound. “We’d like to see developments adopt proven, commonsense building techniques, so we can clean up Puget Sound, reduce flooding risks, while at the same time supporting our green building industries. The current draft versions of the permits simply don’t get us there.”
"We know that when they're well-designed, LID strategies work. They slow runoff and improve the quality of water entering receiving bodies like Puget Sound. They also can provide beautiful amenities that increase property resale values,” said Joel Sisolak, outreach and advocacy director for the Cascadia Green Building Council.
One area of concern is the lack of clear parameters that would prevent a developer from paving over existing green space entirely. The coalition of advocates seeks a balanced ratio of green space to pavement, to prevent excessive polluted runoff from sites that impairs the health of public waterways. This fix would allow development to proceed while preserving effective natural filtration capabilities onsite.
Another opportunity for improvement is to minimize the amount of loopholes that allow developers to continue to use conventional polluting technologies when greener alternatives are available. For example, the new permit drafts allow multiple exemptions from green infrastructure requirements, making it easy for developers to opt out of needed clean water solutions.
Ecology has worked for more than two years with science and policy advisory groups on the municipal stormwater permit redrafting and issuing. People for Puget Sound and Puget Soundkeeper Alliance participated in those advisory groups.
The state has acknowledged that polluted runoff remains the single largest source of toxic pollution for Puget Sound and set a goal for cleaning up Puget Sound by 2020.
The Department of Ecology has started its public comment period to the draft permit, which will run until Feb. 3. Ecology will hold workshops and public hearings starting in December.
Members of the public may submit comments online at:
http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/stormwater/municipal/2012draftMUNIcom.html
]]>No ordinance has been introduced yet, but council members have been reaching out to grocers, retailers and even the city's food banks to gain support and avoid some of the controversies that doomed a 2008 city effort to charge a 20-cent fee for paper and plastic bags.
What's changed over the past three years? Environmentalists say the evidence is stronger than ever that the plastic checkout bags clog landfills, strangle shorebirds and marine life, and break down into smaller and smaller bits without ever decomposing.
"This is about Puget Sound wildlife and the harmful effects of plastic bags in the environment," said Dan Kohler, regional director of Environment Washington, which has joined forces with People for Puget Sound, the Sierra Club and the Surfrider Foundation in calling on Seattle to ban plastic bags.
The City Council enacted a 20-cent fee on both paper and plastic bags in 2008, but voters rejected it a year later, and it never went into effect. Critics complained, among other things, that it was an example of a "nanny state" telling citizens what was good for them.
Bellingham's ordinance, in contrast, was passed by its City Council in July with the support of local grocers and widespread buy-in from residents. It takes effect next year.
"A large part of the work in Bellingham was answering questions raised by Seattle's experience and trying to create an ordinance that worked better," said Heather Trim, policy director for People for Puget Sound.
Seattle City Council President Richard Conlin said Bellingham's ordinance seems to enjoy more widespread support in part because it is less complicated than the one passed by the Seattle City Council. In addition to banning plastic bags, it charges a 5-cent fee for paper bags that goes to stores to reimburse them for the costs.
The Seattle ordinance directed much of the 20-cent fee back to the city for education and recycling efforts, but was seen by some as a tax to fund a new government bureaucracy. And if the goal was to eliminate plastic bags, why not ban them altogether?
"We're looking at the models adopted by other cities. They're simpler, the money goes to the store and not the city, and they've been more successful," Conlin said.
The Seattle ordinance didn't die only of its own weight.
After the ordinance was adopted in 2008, the American Chemistry Council, the lobbying arm of the plastics industry, paid signature gatherers to qualify a referendum for the August 2009 primary. The group then poured $1.4 million into a campaign to defeat the bag fee.
Among the plastic industry's successful messages was that the 20-cent charge disproportionately impacted low-income people and the patrons of food banks, who might not have ready access to reusable bags.
The Bellingham ordinance exempts low-income recipients of government food-assistance programs; it exempts charitable organizations such as food banks; it includes all retail stores, not just grocery, convenience and drugstores; it allows restaurants to offer plastic carryout bags; and it allows the use of plastic bags in the produce, bulk foods and meat sections of grocery stores.
Stephen Trinkaus, owner of Terra Organics, a small Bellingham natural-foods store, said a grass-roots organizing effort around the issue of plastic bags and pollution, coupled with support from two of the city's largest grocery chains, were key to winning approval of the ordinance.
"They [the grocers] said this would save them money on the cost of bags. It's a big cost for grocery stores," Trinkaus said.
Environmental advocates are urging Seattle to adopt the Bellingham ordinance as a way to promote consistent regulations.
"Grocers are concerned about having to respond to a patchwork of ordinances across the state," Trim said. "Enacting the same ordinance means, if you're Safeway, you have the same operations throughout Washington."
Edmonds adopted Washington state's first plastic-bag ban in July 2009. It took effect the following year.
Both Oregon and California have considered statewide plastic-bag bans, but the plastics lobby has helped kill those bills, according to news accounts.
A plastic-bag ban in Portland that applies only to major grocery chains and some big-box retailers went into effect Oct. 15.
]]>Every day, oceans do us a huge favor by absorbing about a third of the carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere by human activities. But as we burn more fossil fuels and clear forests, our oceans absorb more and become more acidic. The result is water that's potentially lethal to a large swath of creatures that play a huge role in aquatic ecosystems, the Northwest economy, and our dinner plates.
Sightline's primer on ocean acidification examines the problem of ocean acidification in the context of the Pacific Northwest. Only a few years ago, researchers though acidification would be a problem that was decades-out. But once they started looking for it, they found it nearly everywhere in waters from British Columbia to Baja California. Included in the primer:
- What is ocean acidification and how does it work?
- What's happening in Northwest waters?
- What species will be affected?
- What are the economic consequences of ocean acidification?
- What can we do to reverse this problem?
Listen to the whole interview here.
]]>Sound and Vision is a film about the oceans, told through the stories of people working to clean up, protect, and restore Puget Sound and beyond. The film is set against the BP Deepwater Horizon disaster of 2010, the wake-up call that spurred a national conversation about the vulnerability of our oceans and shoreline. The film addresses the threats facing Puget Sound, examining oil spills, plastic trash, legacy pollution, and ongoing degradation in the form of polluted runoff and household toxins. Sound and Vision looks at ways that people can be involved in working for ocean health, ending with a call for the restoration of Puget Sound, the Gulf, and beyond.
People For Puget Sound made the commitment to fund the production of a major documentary feature as part of its 20th anniversary activities, and to make it available for wide distribution in late 2011 and into 2012 as part of its communications, education and fundraising programs. The goal of the film is to bring awareness to
In 2010, People For Puget Sound met with filmmaker Eric Becker to discuss the possibility of creating a feature-length documentary that looked back to the accomplishments of the organization over its 20-year history. Eric Becker came with impressive credentials, notably his work in filming and producing a short documentary about People For Puget Sound for Social Venture Partners. The film was well received by directors and staff at People For Puget Sound and demonstrated Eric’s technique and directing style.
People For Puget Sound works to protect and restore the health of our land and waters through education and action. They envision a clean and healthy Sound, and will accomplish this by: eliminating contamination of the Sound and Straits; halting the destruction of natural habitats and restoring those habitats to health; and sustaining the Sound and Straits as a healthy source of people’s livelihood, enjoyments and renewal. They work to accomplish their mission by: educating adults and youth in the science and values of a healthy Sound; involving communities and partners in shared responsibilities; and holding public officials accountable for carrying out commitments and enforcing laws and regulations.
Press Contact: Julia Hughes, jhughes@pugetsound.org, 206-456-3791
]]>Over 100 volunteers joined us at our four restoration events at Deer Harbor on Orcas Island, Union Slough Saltmarsh in Everett, Terminal 105 Park along the Duwamish River in Seattle and Woodard Bay NRCA in Olympia. Volunteers helped with restoration tasks ranging from removing invasive weeds, prepping sites for native plantings, and clearing ‘survival rings’ around native trees and shrubs and laying mulch. This was a great kick-off event to lead us into our Fall planting season.
Check out upcoming events and plant a native tree or three with us!
Sound and Vision is a film about the oceans, told through the stories of people working to clean up, protect, and restore Puget Sound and beyond. The film is set against the BP Deepwater Horizon disaster of 2010, the wake-up call that spurred a national conversation about the vulnerability of our oceans and shoreline. The film addresses the threats facing Puget Sound, examining oil spills, plastic trash, legacy pollution, and ongoing degradation in the form of polluted runoff and household toxins. Sound and Vision looks at ways that people can be involved in working for ocean health, ending with a call for the restoration of Puget Sound, the Gulf, and beyond.
People For Puget Sound made the commitment to fund the production of a major documentary feature as part of its 20th anniversary activities, and to make it available for wide distribution in late 2011 and into 2012 as part of its communications, education and fundraising programs. The goal of the film is to bring awareness to
In 2010, People For Puget Sound met with filmmaker Eric Becker to discuss the possibility of creating a feature-length documentary that looked back to the accomplishments of the organization over its 20-year history. Eric Becker came with impressive credentials, notably his work in filming and producing a short documentary about People For Puget Sound for Social Venture Partners. The film was well received by directors and staff at People For Puget Sound and demonstrated Eric’s technique and directing style.
People For Puget Sound works to protect and restore the health of our land and waters through education and action. They envision a clean and healthy Sound, and will accomplish this by: eliminating contamination of the Sound and Straits; halting the destruction of natural habitats and restoring those habitats to health; and sustaining the Sound and Straits as a healthy source of people’s livelihood, enjoyments and renewal. They work to accomplish their mission by: educating adults and youth in the science and values of a healthy Sound; involving communities and partners in shared responsibilities; and holding public officials accountable for carrying out commitments and enforcing laws and regulations.
Sound and Vision premieres on October 3rd at 7pm at the NW Film Forum’s Local Sightings Festival. Tickets are $10 and are now on sale at localsightings.nwfilmforum.org.
Press Contact: Julia Hughes, jhughes@pugetsound.org, 206-456-3791
]]>The original agreement, signed in 1999, allowed SSA Marine to construct an 8.2 million metric ton bulk commodity export facility at Cherry Point. That agreement imposed rigorous operating conditions to minimize the facility’s negative impacts on Puget Sound.
SSA Marine’s new proposal is for a terminal with the greatly expanded capacity of 54 million metric tons annually. This new proposal would significantly increase vessel traffic throughout Puget Sound. Unlike the earlier proposal, the new facility would be used almost exclusively to export coal to Asia, a commodity not covered by the company’s existing permit.
The parties attempted to modify the existing settlement agreement, but ultimately could not agree on a package of construction and operating criteria that would adequately protect the Cherry Point herring population from the impacts of the terminal structure and vessel traffic and loading. The 1999 agreement required SSA Marine to study the herring population and implement a wide range of measures to minimize the impacts of the facility; however, the company fulfilled only a fraction of these commitments over the last decade. As a result, the parties faced considerable uncertainty regarding the impacts that facility would have on herring and other aquatic resources.
“In the twelve years since our original agreement, SSA Marine has repeatedly failed to follow through on its obligations with respect to herring monitoring and evaluation,” said Dave Peeler, Director of Policy at People For Puget Sound. “This long history raised serious doubts about SSA Marine’s commitment to protecting Puget Sound under any new agreement.”
Looming over the negotiations was the prospect that SSA Marine’s new mega-terminal would serve primarily as a coal-export facility, loading the world’s largest ocean-going vessels with Powder River Basin coal bound for markets in Asia. The original permitting process did not address coal dust impacts, increased vessel traffic and terminal capacity, increased rail traffic from the coal trains, or coal’s impact on the global and regional climate.
“We are deeply concerned about the impacts of a coal-export facility at Cherry Point,” said Becky Kelley with Washington Environmental Council. “Coal exports from the proposed facility would negatively impact local communities across the State, harm Puget Sound, and increase climate pollution.”
“Whatcom County is known for its excellent quality of life – its clean air, water, and a community that cares about the health of its neighbors,” said Tanya Baumgart of the League of Women Voters of Bellingham/Whatcom County. “We’re not willing to risk that legacy and the survival of Cherry Point herring on vague promises from SSA Marine that are unsupported by concrete plans or reliable science.”
“The new proposal is to build a massive coal-export facility right in the middle of sensitive habitat for Cherry Point herring,” said Steve Irving of North Cascades Audubon Society. “The herring population is in very bad shape, and this greatly expanded project threatens to push it to extinction.”
The parties to the 1999 agreement are SSA Marine, Washington Department of Ecology, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Whatcom County, and a coalition of public interest groups including League of Women Voters of Bellingham/Whatcom County, North Cascades Audubon Society, People For Puget Sound, and Washington Environmental Council. The public interest groups were represented in the negotiations by Brian Gruber and Joshua Osborne-Klein of the law firm Ziontz, Chestnut, Varnell, Berley & Slonim.
See also: Five Good Reasons for No Deal at Cherry Point
Contacts:
Kerry McHugh, Washington Environmental Council, 206.631.2605, kerry@wecprotects.org
Mike Sato, People For Puget Sound, 206.229.2844,msato@pugetsound.org
Tanya Baumgart, League of Women Voters of Bellingham/Whatcom County, 360.739.1427, PR@LWVbellinghamwhatcom.org
Steve Irving, North Cascades Audubon Society, 360.384.1618, shirvings@yahoo.com
Brian Gruber and Joshua Osborne-Klein, Ziontz, Chestnut, Varnell, Berley & Slonim. 206.448.1230, bgruber@zcvbs.com, joshok@zcvbs.com
--
Save Our Sound.
PEOPLE FOR PUGET SOUND. WE WORK WITH PEOPLE FOR A CLEAN AND HEALTHY SOUND. Join us as we celebrate twenty years of protecting and restoring Puget Sound. Join in the collective power of individual actions.
Many Voices, One Sound | OnePugetSound.org | PugetSound.org